The Honest Answer: It Depends
Any studio quoting a single fixed number before understanding your business is guessing. A professional B2B website in 2026 costs anywhere from a few thousand euros for a focused marketing site to five figures and beyond for a multilingual, integrated platform. The real question is not the price tag, but which variables your scope contains.
The Variables That Drive the Price
Five variables decide the budget. The number of distinct page templates, how much content you can supply versus how much has to be written, how many languages you need, which external systems must integrate, and how much of the design already exists in usable form. Each variable multiplies the others, which is why two sites described as a corporate website can differ by a factor of five.
Page Templates and Content Volume
A five-page brochure site needs one or two templates. A site with distinct home, services, case study, team and contact templates, each with its own layout, is a different build. Original content writing adds cost on top of design, because a page without written copy is a placeholder. If you can supply half the copy yourself, the writing budget drops sharply.
Languages, Integrations and the CMS
Every additional language multiplies the content and QA work, even when the design stays the same. Integrations with CRM, marketing automation, booking or ERP systems carry engineering and testing overhead that does not compress. A CMS your team can edit without a developer saves money every year after launch, which is why it is rarely the place to cut.
Typical Price Bands in 2026
At the lower end, a focused marketing site of five to eight pages with supplied content sits in the range of a few thousand euros. A multilingual site with original content, structured services, a case library and a comfortable CMS sits in the mid range. Custom integrations, membership areas, portals and regulated content push the figure up further, because they carry engineering and review overhead that does not compress well.
What Cheap Websites Cost Later
The cheapest quote is rarely the cheapest outcome. Sites built on an abandoned template accumulate security patches nobody applies, cannot be edited without a developer, and get rebuilt entirely two years later. The total cost of ownership over five years, not the invoice on day one, is the number worth comparing. A site that costs more now but is editable, secure and multilingual from day one usually wins over a five-year horizon.
How to Compare Quotes Fairly
Ask every studio you are considering three questions. What is excluded from the quote? Who writes the content? What happens after launch, and is there a warranty or a support window? Two quotes that look similar on price can differ wildly on what you actually receive. A quote that includes writing, integration and a post-launch review is not more expensive; it is more complete.
Why Do Two Studios Quote Such Different Numbers?
Because one is pricing a template reskin and the other is pricing a structured, editable, multilingual build. The gap shrinks once you compare the same scope: same page count, same languages, same integrations, same number of rounds of revision.
What Is the Cheapest Safe Option?
A small marketing site in one language, with supplied content and a simple CMS, is the cheapest build that still holds up. Anything below that usually skips either the CMS, the writing or the security hardening, and those gaps reappear within a year.
Conclusion
Ask any studio you are considering to explain what is excluded from the quote and what happens after launch. The answer tells you more than the price does. If you would like a range for your specific scope, our pricing page has the details and a short form.